knee

Why Prolong Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene… because polyethylene can wear.

Prolong Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene represents a significant advance in wear reduction. Its resistance to wear provides a promising solution for TKA patients, especially today's more active, physically demanding patient.

While TKA has proven successful, tibial insert wear and damage are often cited as primary causes for an estimated 63,000 revision knee surgeries each year.^1-4 One recent study identified polyethylene wear as the most common cause for knee revisions.⁵ In this study, 44% of knees revised more than 2 years after the index arthroplasty were directly attributed to polyethylene wear.

Prolong Polyethylene is specifically designed to reduce wear and delamination. This includes enhancements to a number of wear factors:

• Reduced topside wear⁶
• Resistance to oxidative degradation⁹
• Reduced backside wear⁸
• Improved resistance to articular subsurface and posterior stabilized (PS) spine/post delamination, pitting, and cracking^1,7

In vitro wear simulator testing demonstrated an 81% reduction in total volumetric wear of CR articular surface components and a 78% reduction in total volumetric wear in PS articular surface components compared to conventional polyethylene. The results of in vitro wear tests have not been shown to correlate with clinical wear mechanisms.

In head-to-head testing specifically designed to result in early onset of delamination, conventional polyethylene inserts repeatedly showed signs of delamination, as compared to Prolong polyethylene, which showed no evidence of delamination.

Prolong Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene is formulated specifically to resist wear under the conditions found in knees and represents a significant scientific advancement in wear reduction. In wear and damage mechanism studies, Prolong Polyethylene consistently resisted oxidation and delamination, thereby decreasing surface wear and subsurface fatigue that can lead to delamination or pitting.⁹

In joint simulator testing, conventional polyethylene exhibited more backside wear compared to Prolong Polyethylene.^8,10

Testing has shown that the Prolong Polyethylene PS Post is at least as strong as the conventional polyethylene post.

Prolong Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene

1. Data on file at Zimmer.
2. Engh GA, Dwyer KA, Hanes CK. Polyethylene wear of metal-backed tibial components in total and unicompartmental knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74(1):9-17.
3. Peters PC Jr, Engh GA, Dwyer KA, Vinh TN. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(6):864-876.
4. Cadambi A, Engh GA, Dwyer KA, Vinh TN. Osteolysis of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9(6):579-594.
5. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7-13.
6. Laurent MP, et al. High cycle wear of highly crosslinked UHMWPE tibial articular surfaces evaluated in a knee wear simulator. Society for Biomaterials 28th Annual Mtg Transactions, 712, 2002.
7. Yao JQ, Gsell R, Laurent MP, Gilbertson LN, Swarts D, Blanchard CR, Crowninshield RD. Improved delamination resistance of melt-annealed electron-beam irradiated highly crosslinked UHMWPE knee inserts. Society for Biomaterials 28th Annual Meeting Transactions, 60, 2002.
8. Yao JQ, Laurent MP, Johnson TS, et al. Backside wear of conventional and high crosslinked UHMWPE tibial inserts as tested in knee wear simulator. Society for Biomaterials 29th Annual Meeting Transactions, 609, 2003.
9. Gsell R, Yao JQ, Laurent MP, Crowinshield RD. Improved oxidation resistance of highly crosslinked UHMWPE for total knee arthroplasty. Society for Biomaterials 27th Annual Meeting Transactions, 84, 2001.
10. Crowninshield RD, Yao JQ, Wimmer MA, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Blanchard CR. An assessment of polyethylene backside wear in a modular tibial total knee system. Data on file at Zimmer.